The nation elected a president that vowed to make a change in the direction of our country. The nation did the same thing eight years ago when the mantra was hope and change. Under that president the changes were incremental, but devastating for many.
Good, bad or indifferent, President Trump is wasting no time to make the changes he promised. The response from the opposition is nothing short of incredible. People are amassing and marching across the country, including New Mexico, to oppose Trump’s actions. Unfortunately it appears that they are gathering in opposition to Trump without any understanding of what he may or may not be doing.
While, for good or bad, as the rest of the world literally marches on in the wake of the 2016 Presidential election, there are those elitists on the left coasts who are still trying to figure out how Trump won. The overwhelming win in the Electoral College in the light of the fact that the popular vote would have dictated a different outcome prompts is hard for many to understand and precipitates calls to eliminate the college.
In a mid-December New York Times article entitled “Why Trump Had an Edge in the Electoral College” author Nate Cohn attempts to explain the situation in what started out to be unbiased fashion. He noted that “California sided with Mrs. Clinton by a vote margin of four million, or 30 percentage points.”
There was a new national disease diagnosed in early November 2016. Fox News labeled it election depression (ED). This acronym is used for other things, so always be sure which malady or job you are referring to.
Fox seemed to think this was a new discovery. Sadly they are wrong. I, and I am sure many others, have suffered off and on with election depression since 1992. In 1997 I was driven to wear a black arm band on Inauguration Day during the American Sheep Industry Convention.
Last month I wrote about an amicus brief that had been filed by Robert Redford and former Governor Bill Richardson and their Foundation to Protect New Mexico Wildlife in a Mexican wolf case. As some of you with better reading comprehension than I had at last month’s writing, the case they have filed a brief in is the one between the New Mexico Department of Game & Fish (NMDGF) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS). In this case the Department requested and received a temporary restraining order to prohibit the FWS releasing any more wolves in New Mexico without proper consultation with the NMDGF. This ruling was made in New Mexico Federal District Court.
At first thought I would start this month with something at least semi-humorous about the upcoming election… and how soon we all want it to be over. But on second thought, the matter is much too serious for jokes.
Every election year I think most of us feel that this could be the most important election of our life-times. This year is no different and the stakes could not be higher from the top of the ticket all the way to the bottom.
One section of the ballot that never receives enough attention is the judges. Judges aren’t allowed to campaign like other candidates and it is pretty easy to just skip over voting for them. You might know someone in your local area that is running for judge so you vote for them, but do you even know who is running for the New Mexico State Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals?